Not complaining, mind---I appreciate all visitors and comments----but it is interesting that I don't get much of a traffic spike when I'm focused on science and education, but my hits triple as soon as there's hint of some ki
nd of religious question, even those unrelated to my little tete-a-tete with the 'notorious' Vox.
Maybe I should include a few teen diva posts and see what happens, just as an experiment. In fact, let's do this now: Darwin's evolutionary theory makes no predictions about Lindsday Lohan. Or Britney Spears. Or my Aunt Fanny. But Britney's troubles, and Lindsay's rehab, and (oh, what the hell) Ana Nicole's death and the fascination they seem to hold for us might, just might, be explicable in evolutionary terms. At least, so says Robin Dunbar.
9/21/2007
JUST ANA OBSERVATION, BRITNEY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
a/s/l?
so i herd u liek mudkips
Hmm. As I said, this post is an experiment. And the above seem to be anomalies.
I appreciate your patience in engaging Vox's rhetoric. But I'm looking for answers, not for erected brick walls to obfuscate science (which many IDers do). So while I enjoy reading a few of your replies to his criticism (your replies that contain good science elucidating TENS), my interest doesn't go far beyond that.
Post a Comment