tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post3141129570706457103..comments2023-12-28T17:14:24.356-08:00Comments on Monkey Trials: ENDORSED BY YOUR LEADING CREATIONISTSScott Hatfield . . . .http://www.blogger.com/profile/00363885800131794994noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-46869905078998647152008-02-12T16:58:00.000-08:002008-02-12T16:58:00.000-08:00Actually, no play on words was intended. There wa...Actually, no play on words was intended. There was a popular advertising campaign many years ago that used that exact phrase to push 'Smuckers' jams and jellies. It sounded funny and was quickly parodied, because of course the name <I>doesn't</I> guarantee a product's quality in and of itself. And that's the point with the breathless publicity I linked to, that despite the celebrity Scott Hatfield . . . .https://www.blogger.com/profile/00363885800131794994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-25977273069118805312008-02-12T09:53:00.000-08:002008-02-12T09:53:00.000-08:00I guess I didn't get the Smuckers reference, unles...I guess I didn't get the Smuckers reference, unless it was a play on the word "schmucks", or "suckers". But the ridicule, I did get that. As PZ says, "ridicule works!".<BR/><BR/>When it comes to the material world, I am a believer in evidence: material evidence for the material world. So maybe you or someone who visits here could direct me to the material evidence that proves evolution to be Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com