tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post7076149323937968562..comments2023-12-28T17:14:24.356-08:00Comments on Monkey Trials: THIS JUST IN . . .Scott Hatfield . . . .http://www.blogger.com/profile/00363885800131794994noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-23157478991109220462020-07-28T09:52:12.333-07:002020-07-28T09:52:12.333-07:002020.07.29不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因知名酒店大亨夏成龍傳出因癌症過世的消息,享年72歲...2020.07.29<a href="https://blog.xuite.net/c555106/blog/589025782" title="不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因" rel="nofollow">不敢來酒店上班-酒店打工的原因</a>知名酒店大亨夏成龍傳出因癌症過世的消息,享年72歲,這位<a href="https://mra555106.pixnet.net/blog/post/229173878-%e3%80%8a-%e9%85%92%e5%ba%97%e4%b8%8a%e7%8f%ad%e6%89%93%e5%b7%a5%e3%80%8b%e9%85%92%e5%ba%97%e5%b0%8f%e5%a7%90%e4%b8%8a%e7%8f%ad%e9%80%9a%e5%b8%b8%e6%9c%83%e5%8f%96%e4%bb%80" title="酒店小姐的基本梁爵https://www.blogger.com/profile/15249524553168374109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-79869319570435903232020-02-03T13:34:20.499-08:002020-02-03T13:34:20.499-08:002020.02.04根據2019年度調查酒店工作有6成4上班族有意願酒店上班,並盼藉此酒店打工加薪新...2020.02.04根據2019年度調查<a href="https://mra555106.pixnet.net/blog" title="酒店工作" rel="nofollow">酒店工作</a>有6成4上班族有意願<a href="https://blog.xuite.net/dd09160203/123456789/57443305" title="酒店上班" rel="nofollow">酒店上班</a>,並盼藉此<a href="https://blog.xuite.net/c555106/blog/38310229-%E9%85%92%E5%BA%97%E6%89%93%E5%B7%A5%3A%E6%A2%81%E6%9B%89%E5%B0%8A+++~%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E6%87%89%E5%BE%B5%E8%A9%90%E9%A8%99%28%E6%梁爵https://www.blogger.com/profile/15249524553168374109noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-42597897620346674982009-03-29T04:15:00.000-07:002009-03-29T04:15:00.000-07:00Scott:Starwind, it is not a distortion of your pas...Scott:<BR/><BR/><I>Starwind, it is not a distortion of your past posts here to describe your criticism of my pedagogy as prejudicial to belief. That was clearly the argument you made.</I><BR/><BR/>The problem with your "pedagogy" is that you single out Christian creationists for ridicule and indoctrination while holding out one man's Catholicism (Miller's) over another's (Behe's), and while stateStarwindnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-90807424502357211062009-03-29T01:05:00.000-07:002009-03-29T01:05:00.000-07:00I never said anyone had a constitutional right to ...<I>I never said anyone had a constitutional right to not have their religious beliefs contradicted by some government website. Regardless, the ruling you are crowing about is that the plaintiff didn't establish "injury in fact" and on that basis there was no case for the Supreme Court (or any court) to consider. But not being legally injured by a Darwinism website and Darwinism being compatible Scott Hatfield . . . .https://www.blogger.com/profile/00363885800131794994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-66677840374435074872009-03-28T10:19:00.000-07:002009-03-28T10:19:00.000-07:00*chirp, chirp* That was me. ;-) I haven't weighed ...*chirp, chirp* That was me. ;-) I haven't weighed in on this issue, either. Right now I have bigger fish to fry. (I wrote a paper I hope you'd be proud of, and it nearly killed me, eaaugh!)<BR/><BR/>But it seems that the average ID Joe or Jane cannot see how the bright lights in the movement turn tail at the slightest resistance, leaving ordinary folks like Caulfield holding a bag that they Kristinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04350976542988396333noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-54340055981724786782009-03-28T08:56:00.000-07:002009-03-28T08:56:00.000-07:00Starwind: First: Why can't Scott believe in evolu...Starwind: First: Why can't Scott believe in evolution and his God? The latter is faith based and the former is fact based. They are not based on the same thing. <BR/><BR/>Second: There is NO such thing as Darwinism. It is not a religion, a belief system, or anything else you inappropriately choose to categorize it as. Your choosing to create an either/or status, as if they are both belief MI Dawnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05511751704151268307noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-68691490776435041182009-03-27T22:49:00.000-07:002009-03-27T22:49:00.000-07:00Scott;Your recent post has been brought to my atte...Scott;<BR/><BR/>Your recent post has been brought to my attention, to wit:<BR/><BR/><I>Starwind, who filled up my comments thread with lengthy sermons as to my supposed hypocrisy on this point, nothing to say? I mean, really, this is pretty much a rejection by the courts of the merits of your argument, which claimed that even an allusion to or an acknowledgement of evolution-friendly belief was Starwindnoreply@blogger.com