tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post388841675236263038..comments2023-12-28T17:14:24.356-08:00Comments on Monkey Trials: EXPOSING VOX'S INNER RATScott Hatfield . . . .http://www.blogger.com/profile/00363885800131794994noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-67351327761993249792007-10-16T17:12:00.000-07:002007-10-16T17:12:00.000-07:00Emerod, thanks for your comments. They are percep...Emerod, thanks for your comments. They are perceptive. In the main, I agree, though I do believe that my failure to maintain my previous pace of deviltry also led to flagging interest. I had many more visits when I was haranguing Vox's many wanna-be clones than when I focused just on my site.<BR/><BR/>I do hope you will visit again. I do intend to further explore my own faith commitments and Scott Hatfield . . . .https://www.blogger.com/profile/00363885800131794994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953644170899103489.post-27301335964629484912007-10-16T12:53:00.000-07:002007-10-16T12:53:00.000-07:00Scott,It appears that your "debate" with Vox has d...Scott,<BR/><BR/>It appears that your "debate" with Vox has dribbled down to nothing, so I will likely not darken your comments section further. <BR/><BR/>With this post, I think you have probably won by a technical decision, i.e., on points. I was disappointed that Vox's argument was not as rigorous as I had expected. <BR/><BR/>Not that I expected his approach to convince you, but I thought his Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com